In this blog we have compared internal antennas to external ones for Wi-Fi access.
In most indoor deployments, such as offices, schools, hospitals and care homes, access points with internal antennas provide adequate coverage and satisfy aesthetic requirements. Typically, the access point will be mounted on the ceiling with most of the radiation propagating downwards.
When deploying external antennas, there is more control gained over the energy radiated, compared to internal antennas, which have fixed coverage. An external antenna can tailor the shape of the coverage needed – even for challenging design requirements, such as a large open area. To protect the access point from harsh environmental conditions, the access point and antenna can be mounted separately. External antennas also benefit for reducing CCI by ‘shaping’ the RF. With the flexibility of external antennas, changing an external antenna may be all that’s needed – which ends up saving money.
Choosing the right external antenna also depends on the usage.
High ceilings can be very limited for mounted access points, omni-directional antennas perform well up to 25 feet, but above that the signal strength of handheld devices is poor. Whereas an external antenna would be beneficial as they allow focused coverage in the narrow aisles of metal racks.
Many places require outdoor coverage. using external antennas can be beneficial because it enables the access points to be placed inside, away from potential theft or weather-related damage.
To provide Wi-Fi coverage for many people seated closely, it is not achievable using an internal antennas access point. Using an external antenna with high gain, and a high directional coverage design, can be used to intentionally provide coverage to seating areas only.
How we install for the best business Wi-Fi